ReviewReviewNo Country For Old MenFeb 1, '08 6:28 PM
for everyone
Category:Movies
Genre: Drama
I watched this movie because it was the pick to win the Oscar for Best Picture this year. I don't get it. I did not like it. It was very long and episodic. While there well-shot individual scenes, yet with no coherence in its totality. It seemed to be about this guy Llewelyn Moss (Josh Brolin) who stumbled into a bag containing two million dollars, and how this money turns his life topsy-turvy (I know, we've seen that before). But somewhere down the line, it lost me as to what it was really all about.

The violence is too brash and in-your-face, yet numbing and gratuitous. These scenes are largely due to one man, Anton, played by Javier Bardem, who really very creepy in his cool yet crazed killer role. He went to town with it, and is considered a lock for the Best Supporting Actor prize. While I was very distracted with his weird hairstyle, he was successful in developing tension in every scene he was in. He was especially effective in the quiet scenes like that with the gas station owner, the wife of Moss, and even that with a miscast Woody Harrelson. The question always comes up in your head--will he shoot them or not?

The Texas accents are too thick for me to understand the dialogues clearly, and that further reduced my full understanding. That entire mumbling monologue of Tommy Lee Jones that brought the movie to an unsatisfying, not to mention, sudden, end was such a major anti-climactic let-down for me.

I liked the Coen brothers' work with "Fargo," that actually succeeds despite its unusual premise. But this one is very disorganized in its direction. This was exemplified was that strange decision was having a main character die off-camera. Why? It felt like you just wasted your time following his actions and decisions, just to have his character snuffed out so suddenly and anonymously.

In general, I was very disappointed with this one. Maybe too much high expectations led to my reduced appreciation. I don't really get the title up to now. Definitely, this was not how I felt after watching "The Departed" the other year. I knew right away that film was a winner. This one, I don't think I would even have the patience to watch again.


2 Comments
circe1202 wrote on Feb 2
Not being a fan of the Coen brothers, I didn't have high expectations when I went to see this one. And I actually liked it. Looks like we are opposites here, since I didn't like "Fargo" at all, but I could quite appreciate this movie. While Llewelyn Moss is the central person in this movie, since he's the one that starts the whole movie, I didn't consider him as the one main actor in the movie. Both Anton and Ed are equally important in the story, even though they're considered as the supporting actors.
I didn't really have any problems with the violence, and I think it served an important role in the movie. When you steal a lot of money, you can expect people coming after you that aren't very friendly.
Whether it will win this year's Oscar for best motion picture, I don't know. First have to see some of the others that are in the running for that award.
3xhcch wrote on Feb 4
From imdb.com:

Acclaimed Coen Brothers movie No Country For Old Men picked up another top film prize in Hollywood on Saturday when it claimed gold at the Producers Guild of America gala. The Oscar-nominated film, starring Javier Bardem, Josh Brolin and Tommy Lee Jones, beat fellow Academy Award hopefuls There Will Be Blood, Juno and Michael Clayton. Ethan Coen and Joel Coen were on hand to collect the prestigious Darryl F. Zanuck Producer of The Year award. The film is a front runner to claim gold at the Oscars on February 24. after picking up the Directors Guild of America and Screen Actors Guild Best Film prizes, among a string of honors.
Add a Comment
How would you rate this movie? (optional)
   
© 2008 Multiply, Inc.    About · Blog · Terms · Privacy · Corp Info · Contact Us · Help